#1369 closed defect (fixed)
A new array design does not get a registered date
Reported by: | Jari Häkkinen | Owned by: | everyone |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | BASE 2.13.1 |
Component: | core | Version: | 2.13 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
I am adding a new array design but there is no registered date associated to the new design. I tried with an extract and a registered date is automatically assigned to it. I also tried array batches and slides and these get a registered date.
Change History (7)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 15 years ago
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Replying to nicklas:
I can't reproduce this. It works just fine when I try it in BASE 2.13.
Can you try it on our production server? It is running 2.13.
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
It seems to work on the production server also. Look at the 'Test of registered' array design owned by the root user.
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
Hm, interesting. Check out 'noregdate design' owned by my admin account.
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
Component: | web → core |
---|
It seems like this problem happens when selecting a platform with a variant. Eg. Illumina SNP. This triggers a different code path that doesn't set the registration date. Compare the two ArrayDesign.getNew()
methods: http://base.thep.lu.se/browser/tags/2.13/src/core/net/sf/basedb/core/ArrayDesign.java#L104 -- 134
It seems like I was incorrect when stating that the registration date was set in a central location. It is not. I think we should also check the RawBioassay
class for a similar problem since it also has more than one getNew()
method.
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
(In [5098]) Fixes #1369: A new array design does not get a registered date
No problem with the RawBioAssay
I can't reproduce this. It works just fine when I try it in BASE 2.13.